Prakash Kashwan is an Associate Professor in the Department of Political Science and Co-Director of the Research Program on Economic and Social Rights, Human Rights Institute, University of Connecticut, Storrs. He is the author of Democracy in the Woods: Environmental Conservation and Social Justice in India, Tanzania, and Mexico (Oxford University Press, 2017). Prakash is a member of the global expert group for Scoping of Transformative Change Assessment by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), a Senior Research Fellow of the Earth System Governance (ESG) Project, and one of the Editors at Environmental Politics.
Stephens JC, Kashwan P, McLaren D, Surprise K. 2021. “The risks of solar geoengineering research,” Science. 2021;372(6547):1161-1161.
Kashwan, Prakash, Biermann, Frank, Gupta, Aarti & Okereke, Chuks 2020. “Planetary justice: Prioritizing the poor in earth system governance.” Earth System Governance.
Kashwan, Prakash. 2020. “Management in the Guise of Governance? Rethinking the Ends and The Means of Natural Resource Governance” In Fiona Nunan (editor). Governing Renewable Resources. Oxon, UK: Routledge. 19-43
Gupta, Aarti, I. Möller, F. Biermann, S. Jinnah, P. Kashwan, V. Mathur, D.R. Morrow, S. Nicholson. (2020): “Anticipatory governance of solar geoengineering: Conflicting visions of the future and their links to governance proposals”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 45: 10-19.
Kashwan, P., L.M. MacLean, and G.A. García-López. 2019. “Rethinking Power and Institutions in the Shadows of Neoliberalism: (an Introduction to a Special Issue of World Development).” World Development 120: 133-46.
Holahan, R., and P. Kashwan. 2019. “Disentangling the Rhetoric of Public Goods from Their Externalities: The Case of Climate Engineering.” Global Transitions 1: 132-40.
Jinnah, S., S. Nicholson, D.R. Morrow, Z. Dove, P. Wapner, W. Valdivia, L.P. Thiele, C. McKinnon, A. Light, M. Lahsen, P. Kashwan, A. Gupta, A. Gillespie, R. Falk, K. Conca, D. Chong, and N. Chhetri. 2019. “Governing Climate Engineering: A Proposal for Immediate Governance of Solar Radiation Management.” Sustainability 11: 3954.
Kashwan, Prakash. 2017. “Inequality, Democracy, and the Environment: A Cross-National Analysis” Ecological Economics. 131: 139–151
Kashwan, Prakash, and Robert Holahan. 2017. “Nested Governance for Effective REDD+: Institutional and Political Arguments” In Daniel H. Cole and Michael D. McGinnis (eds). Elinor Ostrom and the Bloomington School of Political Economy: A Framework for Policy Analysis (Volume 3) New York, NY: Lexington Books. 275-300. (originally published in 2014 in International Journal of the Commons, 8 (2).
Kashwan, Prakash. 2016. “Integrating Power in Institutional Analysis: A Micro-Foundation Perspective” Journal of Theoretical Politics, 28(1): 5-26.
Kashwan, Prakash. 2016. “Power Asymmetries and Institutions: Landscape Conservation in Central India” Regional Environmental Change, 16: S97–S109
Kashwan, Prakash. 2016. “What Explains the Demand for Collective Forest Rights Amidst Land Use Conflicts?” Journal of Environmental Management, 183, 657-666.
Kashwan, Prakash. 2015. “Forest Policies, Institutions, and REDD+ in India, Tanzania, and Mexico” Global Environmental Politics, 15(3): 95-117.
Kashwan, Prakash. 2013. “The Politics of Rights-based Approaches in Conservation” Land Use Policy, 31: 613-626.
“Resisting the Cynical Politics of Climate Negotiations,” Prakash Kashwan, Praneeta Mudaliar. Planet Politics Institute. April 27, 2021.
CSSN Scholars Prakash Kashwan and Kevin Surprise were quoted in Earther speaking about the recent National Academies report on solar geoengineering, The U.S. Is One Step Closer to Establishing a Research Program to Block the Sun. Earther, March 25,2021.
Prakash Kashwan comments on the direction of geoengineering research. “Should We Block the Sun? Scientists Say the Time Has Come to Study It.”, New York Times, March 25, 2021.
Prakash Kashwan was featured in an article on PNAS Online. “But not all communities in India and elsewhere in the Global South can exercise the kinds of land rights that the villages in this study do, notes Prakash Kashwan, a social scientist specializing in international environmental policy at the University of Connecticut in Storrs. Additional predictive indicators related to social and economic inequality would further strengthen the framework proposed by these authors, he says.”
“To predict the success of tree-planting schemes, look to villagers’ involvement,” Journal Club. National Academy of Sciences. January 29, 2021.
Prakash Kashwan’s essay, American environmentalism’s racist roots have shaped global thinking about conservation, in The Conversation was referred to in the Earth Island Journal’s “The Most Important Environmental Stories of 2020,” September 2, 2020
Prakash Kashwan was interviewed by the New Hampshire Public Radio for their podcast Outside/In. “Setting up of the exclusionary wildlife zones and national parks is determined not by the consideration of environmental factors, but by the existence of domestic inequality…..Prakash analyzed data from 137 countries… and found that democratic countries with low economic inequality are likely to devote less land towards conservation… and countries with the most protected areas…have very high levels of economic inequalities… and second, these are countries with very poor to non-existent democratic institutions. So they’re mostly autocratic countries.”
“Fortress Conservation,” Outside/In Podcast, November 5, 2020.
Prakash Kashwan was quoted extensively in Down To Earth, comparing Mexico’s, forest governance that has been relatively more successful in meeting the twin goals of “protecting the environment and the statutory rights of forest-dependent people….The main reason for such success is that the actions of the Mexican forest and environment ministry are often scrutinised by independent ministerial-level agencies. India’s forest department has been accustomed to an unquestioned authority because of the colonial legacies of the Indian Forest Act, 1927,” he said.
“Inter-Ministerial Panel for FRA: A Giant Step Backwards, Say Experts,” Down To Earth. October 23, 2020